|
Post by Official Occupy Tulsa on Jan 1, 2012 22:28:29 GMT -6
At this Wednesday's meeting (12/4), I'd like to propose that an internal judicial matter must be given a week for investigation and a notification to the accused person for them to show up to address the charges. If, within that week, that person chooses not to make arrangements to show up at a reasonable pre-arranged time within the GA's schedule, then a decision can still be made against them at the next meeting. I will also propose that the hearing phase take place before other business, as a disgruntled individual could seek to disrupt or sabotage other decisions within the meeting before their case is heard. Though if the person is at the meeting in which the charges are brought up, and an investigation has been performed prior to the meeting so that all are satisfied, the accused may choose to have the decision made against them then and there. Otherwise the matter must be held for 1 week.
|
|
|
Post by Official Occupy Tulsa on Jan 1, 2012 22:36:58 GMT -6
A few questions asked during a GA meeting does not constitute a proper investigation, even if the investigative tools are all there. If the accused person has not been given the chance to defend themselves, it's not an investigation, but a witch-hunt.
|
|